• mHealth
  • EMGuidance web-platform to simplify medication look-up in South Africa

    Since the launch of their clinical support platform in 2016, EMGuidance has become one of the most popular medical apps in South Africa, even extending to other parts of the globe.  Its popularity is largely due to the comprehensive, up-to-date and locally relevant clinical guides and protocols made easily available to health professionals.

    In fact, the response from health professionals has been so great that EMGuidance is now available as a web-based platform.  The web-based platform essentially functions as a Google search engine with a twist.  This niche search engine only returns locally relevant information – fulfilling a great gap in clinical support tools in South Africa.  Health professionals will now be able to search for relevant South African therapies by trade name, active ingredient or registered indication. 

    Realising the potential for other African countries, EMGuidance has launched a slim-line version of their tool in Sierra Leone.  The positive response from the local community has spurred plans to expand to Kenya, Tanzania and other African countries.  It’s activities and initiatives like EMGuidance that will springboard eHealth in Africa to first-world healthcare delivery.

  • Ghana will have a national telemedicine service next year

    Pilotitis become a phenomenon a few years ago as scaling-up eHealth pilots became too challenging. Good scale-up news is the recent  telemedicine initiative by Ghana Health Service and The Novartis Foundation, They’ve announced the successful integration and scale-up of a telemedicine service. National coverage’s planned for 2019. 

    The 24-hour telemedicine service uses mHealth for community health workers to consult specialist health professionals at teleconsultation centres on a range of health topics, including emergencies. It builds from the telemedicine pilot started in 2011 in the Ashanti Region’s Amansie West District.

    An important lesson for other African countries’s the timescale. Seven years may seem like a long time, but eHealth does take time to come to fruition. Over the period, telemedicine has encountered some specific changes. mHealth opportunities have replaced conventional conferencing technology, now obsolete and looking a bit clumsy and chunky.

    Ghana may have set a standard for other African countries to follow. It represents a considerable technological achievement in modernising and transforming healthcare. 

  • mHealth to drive Cote d’Ivoire's immunisation project

    Like falling snow, announcements at the World Economic Forum come thick and fast. Taking place in Davos Switzerland, Thursday 25th, 2018, one of the world’s leading telecommunications operators, Orange SA and the Vaccine Alliance Gavi announced a partnership with Côte d’Ivoire’s Ministry of Health to boost immunisation rates in the countries’ regions and districts with the lowest vaccine coverage.

    A report in Ventures Africa says it’s a joint US$ 5.47m five-year project. Half the money’s from the Gavi Matching Fund, a mechanism financed by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to motivate and provide incentives for private sector investment in immunisation. It builds from Gavi’s longstanding role in the country starting form 2001, Gavi supported Côte d’ Ivoire in introducing eleven vaccines.

    It all fits with the M-Vaccin Côte d’ Ivoire initiative. It uses Orange mobile technology to inform parents about the importance of vaccination. Sending text and voice messages in local languages and targeting messages about keeping immunisation sessions are standard themes. Reminders of their children’s schedules and dates are the main goals.

    The initiative should be transferrable to all African countries. It’ll be good to see vaccination rates above 95% soon.

  • mHealth sigue expandiéndose, pero África y Sudamérica están detrás

    El mercado de mHealth ha estado creciendo constantemente y se mantendrá. En su informe “mHealth App Economics 2017 Current Status and Future Trends in Mobile Health”, Research2Guidance (R2G), una empresa de asesoramiento de estrategia e investigación de mercado, evalúa cómo los “intrusos digitales” se están apropiando del mercado de la salud.

    Este año, hay 325,000 aplicaciones de salud y acondicionamiento físico disponibles en todas las principales tiendas de aplicaciones. Son 78,000 más que el año pasado.

    La mayoría de los profesionales de eHealth vienen de Europa, 47% y 36% de los EE. UU., Un 83% combinado. Asia-Pacífico representa el 11%. Sudamérica y África están en el 4% y 2% respectivamente, lo que confirma la necesidad de un mayor desarrollo de capacidad humana. 

    Otros hallazgos incluyen:

    Android adelanta a Apple en los números de aplicaciones de salud84,000 editores de aplicaciones de salud lanzan aplicacionesAmpliación de la demanda y la brecha de oferta, con un alto número de desarrolladores y bajas tasas de crecimiento de las descargasInversión de US $ 5.4bn en empresas de eSalud que abastecen al mercadoLos usuarios descargarán aproximadamente 3.6bn de aplicaciones en 201718% no está desarrollando aplicaciones de salud debido a regulaciones inciertas53% de los profesionales de eHealth esperan que los seguros de salud sean el canal de distribución futuro con el mejor potencial de mercado. 

    Dos tipos de aplicaciones pueden tener un gran impacto en la atención médica. La Inteligencia Artificial (IA) es vista como la tecnología más disruptiva. Se considera que la combinación con el monitoreo remoto es la tecnología que más perturbará la atención médica. El perfil: 

    AI 61% Monitoreo remota y asistencia 43% “Wearables” 34% IoT 30% Realidad virtual e inteligencia 27% Impresión 3D 22% “Blockchain” 18% 5G 8% Otro 5%. 

    Parece que hay una oportunidad para que los sistemas de salud de África respalden y amplíen su oferta de aplicaciones de salud local.

  • South Africa’s mHealth has opportunities and bigger barriers

    Much has been made of the growth in mobile phones and their opportunities for Africans’ better health. A qualitative study in Science Direct found that there may not be a high positive correlation. It says while mobile phones have been evolving to fill South Africa’s primary care services gaps, there are barriers to access. Poor digital infrastructure and low digital literacy are two main longstanding inhibitors. 

    The study investigated mobile phone use by a wide range of people. It included patients with chronic diseases, pregnant women and health workers in Mpumalanga, South Africa. In 2014, semi-structured in-depth interviews were completed with 113 patients and 43 health workers from seven primary healthcare clinics and a district hospital.

    Some health workers and patients used their own mobile phones for healthcare, bearing the cost themselves, Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) initiatives. Patients used their mobile phones to remind themselves to take medication or attend clinic visits. They appreciated receiving voice call reminders.

    Some patients and health workers accessed websites and used social media to gather health information, but lacked web search strategies. Patients and health workers’ use of websites and social media was intermittent due to affordability constraints for airtime. Many didn’t know what to search for and where to search. 

    Doctors developed their own informal mobile health solutions for their work needs. It also overcomes resource constraints due to rurality. 

    Removing these seemingly unresponsive barriers needs investment in people and infrastructure. It’s a critical component of successful eHealth.

     

  • eHealth Africa pilots AVADAR to track Toward Polio Eradication progress

    In response to the reported cases of wild poliovirus in Nigeria, eHealth Africa (eHA) partnered with Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the  WHO, and Novel-T to pilot a mobile surveillance app for Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) in children. It’s a condition of a rapid onset of weakness of people’s extremities, and includes Guillain-Barré syndrome.  AFP often causes weakness of respiration and swallowing muscles, progressing to maximum severity within one to ten days. 

    WHO defines AFP surveillance as six goals:

    Track wild poliovirus circulationUse data to classify cases as confirmed, polio-compatible or discardedMonitor routine coverage and surveillance performance using standard indicators in all geographical areas and focus efforts in ones that are low-performingMonitor seasonality to determine low season of poliovirus transmissions to help to plan National Immunisation Days (NID)Identify high-risk areas to plan mop-up immunisation campaignsProvide evidence to certification commissions of interruptions of wild poliovirus circulation. 

    Standard indicators are: 

    >90% of expected monthly reports>1/1000,000 annualised non-polio AFP rate per 100,000 children under 15>80% of AFP cases investigated within 48 hours>80% of AFP cases with two adequate stool specimens collected 24-48 hours apart and less than 14 days after onset>80% of specimens arriving at laboratories in good condition>80% of specimens arriving at a WHO-accredited laboratories within three days of despatch>80% of specimens for which laboratories’ results sent within 28 day turn round. 

    AFP surveillance’s one of four cornerstone strategies of polio eradication. The objective’s to identify all cases of polio through a system that targets any case of AFP as a potential case of polio.  AVADAR’s a surveillance tool on android mobile devices provided to health workers and community informants. It aids AFP detection and reporting both in health facilities and local communities.

  • mHealth keeps expanding, but Africa and South America are trailing

    The mHealth market’s been growing steadily, and will keep it up. In its report mHealth App Economics 2017 Current Status and Future Trends in Mobile HealthResearch2Guidance (R2G), a strategy advisory and market research company, assesses how digital intruders are taking over the healthcare market. 

    This year, there are 325,000 health and fitness apps available from all major app stores. It’s 78,000 more than last year.

    Most eHealth practitioners come from Europe, 47%, and 36% from the US, a combined 83%. Asia-Pacific accounts for 11%. South America and Africa trail at 4% and 2% respectively, confirming the need for increased human capacity development.

    Other findings include:

    Android’s overtaking Apple in health app numbers84,000 health app publishers release appsWidening demand and supply gap, with high number of developers and low downloads growth ratesUS$5.4bn investment in eHealth start-ups fuelling the marketUsers will download an estimated 3.6bn apps in 201718% are not developing health apps because of uncertain regulations53% of eHealth practitioners expect health insurances to be  the future distribution channel with best market potentialAn estimated 28% pure eHealth market players in the eHealth industry.

    Two app types may have a big healthcare impact. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is seen as the most disruptive technology.  It’s seen as combining with remote monitoring to be the technologies that will disrupt healthcare most. The profile’s:

    AI 61%Remote monitoring and assistance 43%Wearables 34%IoT 30%Virtual reality and intelligence 27%3D printing 22%Blockchain 18%5G 8%Other 5%. 

    It seem that there’s an opportunity for Africa’ health systems to support and expand their local health app supply side. An integrated demand and supply strategy could do it.

     

  • Is connected eHealth enough to lead to healthier people?

    eHealth’s ICT network, and especially mHealth’s, offers considerable potential for healthier people. Like all eHealth, its probable impact is always less than its potential. A study in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) by a research team in Montreal, Canada, identified the phenomenon for connected health tools.

    Is Connected Health Contributing to a Healthier Population? Reviews  mHealth’s health impact. It,

    It’s clear that mHealth enables more precise diagnostics, personalised health recommendations that enhance patient experiences and outcomes and contains healthcare costs. But, for mHealth to achieve its full potential, at least five issues need addressing.

    JMIR’s editor says JMIR Publications discourages the use of Connected Health (cHealth). It’s not clear if how it differs from eHealth, mHealth or Ubiquitous Health (uHealth). eHNA’ll stick with eHealth and mHealth.

    One issue’s achieving active engagement in mHealth use, privacy, security, quality, and developing evidence-based guidelines. The expanding mHealth market, at over 165,000 apps in 2015, conveys an urgent imperative to deal with these. With such a profile and plethora, it’s a bit odd that only 12% of health-related apps have 90% of downloads; a considerable underutilisation and corresponding limited impact on health.

    Maybe, as the study hints, the current focus technology may be too extensive, while simultaneously ignoring the need for a paradigm shift in healthcare providers from fixer to coach, that welcomes, encourages, requires and activates patients’ engagement in their own wellness and care. It could be that uptake strategies are needed to ensure individual’s mHealth engagement is their highest prior for health and illness issues. Succeeding may need a better understanding of the health literacy gap causes.

    Quality’s a challenge. Many consumers, developers and manufacturers aren’t aware of many of mHealth’s technological standards and regulations. Lacking supporting evidence, users often rely on subjective five-star ratings to gauge quality. Apple’s App Store advises that “medical apps that could provide inaccurate data or information, or that could be used for diagnosing or treating patients may be reviewed with greater scrutiny.” Recent initiatives might help overcome this risk and misplaced dependency:

    Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework evaluates health behaviourMobile App Rating Scale (MARS) assess and scores qualityConsolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT-EHEALTH) encompasses initiatives developed by the CONSORT Group to alleviate problems arising of inadequate randomised controlled trial (RCT) reporting.

    Africa’s mHealth emphasis should take note of these. Without them, mHealth may become just a bit of Health.

  • Mobicure wins World Expo grant

    A Nigerian eHealth start-up Mobicure has won an Expo Live grant. An article in Disrupt Africa says it

    OMOMI application, which helps expectant mothers and parents of under-five-year-olds monitor the wellbeing of their children from home. The award’s up to US$100,000, made available incrementally depending on progress and results. 

    OMOMI’s a mobile platform. At the touch of a button, mothers can easily monitor their children’s health, access life-saving maternal and child health information and medical expertise. It was launched in Benin City in 2015 and now has 31,000 users with over 4,000 active monthly users. In the last nine months, it’s seen a 450% rise in users. The Expo Live grant will help it achieve three more goals. One’s an expanded reach to more families. Another’s adding more features and health information. The third’s promoting OMOMI to more parents in Sub-Saharan Africa.

    Emirates is delighted to host the next World Expo, in Dubai in 2020. Will another African eHealth start-up succeed there?

  • Burkina Faso’s MOS@N muestra el valor de compromiso

    Para alcanzar la Cobertura Universal de Salud (UHC)  se necesita que el acceso a la atención médica sea mas amplio. En Burkina Faso, MOS@N, un proyecto de mHealth está ayudando a las poblaciones vulnerables del distrito de Nouna a mejorar su acceso y lograr una mejor salud. Tambien, al superar los prejuicios de género, ha mejorado el estatus de las trabajadoras de la salud. 

    Las altas tasas de mortalidad materna son un importante desafío de la salud pública para Burkina Faso. Nouna tiene 341 muertes maternas por cada 100.000 nacidos vivos. Solo el 70% de las mujeres recibe atención prenatal y el 34% da a luz en el hogar. Las tasas de VIH / SIDA siguen siendo altas, con alrededor del 30% de las personas infectadas que no siguen el tratamiento requerido. 

    El acceso a la atención materna enfrenta numerosos obstáculos. Incluyendo las distancias a los centros de salud, la escasez de personal de salud calificado, la falta de información sobre la salud sexual y reproductiva y los altos costos del tratamiento médico. La información de salud para mujeres embarazadas y proveedores de servicios de salud a menudo no se entrega en el momento adecuado y podria estar desactualizada. Los valores sociales paternalistas profundamente arraigados pueden llevar a que muchos hombres prohíban a sus esposas asistir a los centros de salud en lugar de trabajar en los campos. 

    Lanzado en 2013, el nombre de MOS@N se deriva de móvil y santé. Su objetivo es mejorar el acceso de la atención de calidad para madres, niños y personas con VIH / SIDA. Al principio, los investigadores del Centro de Investigación en Salud de Nouna, un instituto de investigación del Ministerio de Salud, se dispusieron a determinar si las TIC y los teléfonos móviles podrían mejorar la administración de la salud para un acceso más equitativo a la asistencia sanitaria. Financiado por el Centro Internacional de Investigaciones para el Desarrollo (IDRC) y llevado a cabo en colaboración con la Universidad de Montreal, MOS@N se desplegó en centros de salud que prestaban servicios en 26 aldeas.

    El estudio, Posicionamiento de la Salud Movil: un estudio cualitativo de las expectativas de mHealth en el distrito de salud rural de Nouna, Burkina Faso, publicado en Springer, confirmó el éxito de MOS@N en el fortalecimiento del sistema de salud y la mejora del acceso. A fines de 2016, 2.161 mujeres embarazadas habían recibido atención prenatal. Los partos asistidos aumentaron en un 50% a más del 97%. Los trabajadores de la salud pudieron rastrear a casi 260 pacientes que viven con el VIH y lograron una baja tasa de abandono de solo el 1.6% de los casos. 

    MOS@N también aumentó la equidad y la participación en la administración de la salud. Las mujeres fueron fundamentales para la implementación del proyecto y ayudaron a determinar los servicios de salud materno e infantil ofrecidos. Unos contactos directos más fuertes con los centros de salud y un fácil acceso a la información les ayudará a mantener los logros alcanzados. 

    Un artículo del IDRC en la web de Relief dice que “marraines”, madrinas, que usan teléfonos móviles, se han convertido en actores centrales en la educación y movilización de la salud, roles que anteriormente desempeñaban los trabajadores de la salud de la comunidad masculina. Elegidos por los líderes de las aldeas para acompañar a las mujeres durante el embarazo y el parto, las “marraines” son intermediarias entre su comunidad y los trabajadores de la salud.

    MOS@N enfatiza el papel de la comunidad en la entrega de tratamiento, el seguimiento de pacientes y la entrega de mensajes y recordatorios de concientización. Integra los roles de los centros de atención primaria de salud local, trabajadores de salud, técnicos de TIC, “marraines”, líderes comunitarios e investigadores de salud pública. 

    Se desarrolló localmente utilizando software de código abierto y permite el acceso a la información sobre atención médica materno e infantil y la vida con VIH. Los sistemas de mensajes de texto e interactivos brindan mensajes en cinco idiomas locales, personalizados para satisfacer sus necesidades específicas, que incluyen recordatorios de citas para madres, asegurando la inclusión y una mayor accesibilidad. Todo el contenido cumple con las pautas nacionales para una amplia gama de atención médica. Incluye atención pre y posnatal, parto asistido, vacunación contra la polio y el tétanos, prevención del paludismo y seguimiento de pacientes. Otras características son un sistema central de información de salud desarrollado e integrado en las instalaciones de salud del distrito para recopilar los datos necesarios para el seguimiento y toma de decisiones.

    MOS@N y los hallazgos del estudio ayudarán a guiar las iniciativas de mHealth. El diseño y la implementación que satisfagan las necesidades específicas de los usuarios optimizarán las posibilidades de éxito. Proporciona lecciones para mHealth de África.